Kynell, Teresa. Technical Communication from 1850-1950: Where Have We Been? Technical Communication Quarterly, Spring 1999, Vol. 8, No. 2. (143-151)
Formation of TC pedagogy; evaluation of shifts in engineering curriculum from 1850-1960.
144 1850-62 most engineers mentored or had a sparse training
144 1862 Morrill Acts = land grant colleges = practical education/professional trade
145 Mansfield Merriman, quoted in Kynell, "The only way to learn to write is to write."
146 Circa 1910 educators grasped that engineers needed real-world context to develop their writing and they should focus on the kinds of writing they'll actually face as professionals
146-7 Earle's 4 abilities that would make English more relevant to engineers
ability to: put into words an abstract though; describe, in writing, an object not present; write for different audiences; give a concept a full treatment by demonstrating understanding in writing
This piece and the Connors, and possibly the Carolyn Miller could go on the reading list as histories of TC/TW. If I am going to focus on TC/TW and comp, then I need to be aware of the histories of both. This article does pretty well in laying a foundation/basis, as well as reference points, to locate more specifics about how TC/TW and comp have been regarded as service courses for nearly a century. Thus, the problems we see with the treatment/references to writing and composition are, in fact, apparent manifestations of the modern university.
Flying by the seat of my pants here, but I do believe that once the shift took place in the 1860s or so away from the classical educational roots is also when composition began to lose face. Essentially, with industrialization and the gutting of Rhetoric, composition fell down in status. The application of text, of words, seems to be far less important than the creation or manufacturing of materials.
Interesting referenced articles:
Gerald Savage 1996 "Redefining the Responsibilities of Teachers and the Social Position of the Technical Communicator"
Miller, Carolyn. "A Humanistic Rationale for Technical Writing." College English 40 (1979): 610-17.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I'd hesitate to say "began to lose face," as I don't really think that's the case. (I focused on 19th century rhet instruction in my master's research & thesis.)
The shift after the civil war has got more to do with the changing contexts of the university student and the "highest purposes of discourse" having changed in American culture at large. Composition pedagogy just had yet to catch up to some very rapid postbellum changes. Enter "current-traditional" pedagogy.
I'd recommend Robert Connors' book (Composition-Rhetoric) if you want to understand this period--it's usually pretty brutally oversimplified, and Connors does a good job of breaking down a pretty interesting time in comp/rhet history. (I'll plug a post on my blog here--http://phdumpingground.blogspot.com/2009/01/wrote-this-today-and-thought-id-post-it.html.
Cool stuff. I'll have to check out this article.
Post a Comment